The Age of No Blessings?

While recognizing that there are several such topics that may lead me to risk being regarded as someone, if without careful handling, who might have a brain sort of out of order; who might deviate himself, to the extent that one can leave no attention perhaps for one’s own interests, from such behavior that may be socially accepted regardless of the diversity in existing human societies; who might be mentally challenged considering the observation that rejects any possibility of understanding from the point of view of any global human standards in the human history; who might rather have dangerous thoughts in his own way of developing his own logic given even the slightest sign of reason if any; and with whom any sort of continued interaction, therefore, could bring hardship of any kind to the one...

Never mind...

The recent practice of a sitting-in-the-sun-with-emptied-brain method suggests that the laws have permanently changed that govern what may not be visible and yet could be felt if and only if the brain or any of the organs that has sort of sensibility is ready to accept it as what it is. There used to be full of friendly hopes in the air. But this does not seem to be the case any more. This does not mean that the air is filled with hostility. Rather the trend is toward the situation where there will be none. Toward neither friendly nor hostile atmosphere. Let us call for simplicity the friendly atmosphere (or what may not be visible and yet could still be felt) the blessings. Then I interpret this situation as the coming of the age of no blessings. Why is this taking place? My good guess is that this is part of the direct and subsequent costs of the GLOBAL FESTIVAL that has been implemented, since the first-of-its-kind event, at the cost of the whatever is owned by those who are brave. Since the GLOBAL FESTIVAL has been mostly based on the free wills of those who at last donate themselves regardless of whether they were conscious about it, the festival is mostly legal and binding both as a political measure or as a magical procedure.

What does the coming age mean? For an ordinary individual the situation remains the same. At least there will be no additional worries. However, for an individual practicing the utilization of the blessings the coming situation could result in a disaster for her/him if s/he continues her/his practice as before. The reason is almost straightforward. As the blessings in the atmosphere gradually cease to being, if a person still tries to utilize the now scarce blessings then s/he will be requested to provide the alternative sources for the blessings at the cost of what s/he truly owns. What can one safely say about what one truly owns? One may say that the one owns her/his own properties in the usual sense. One may say that the one owns her/his own body. One may say that the one owns her/his own ego. One may even say that the one owns her/his own soul. One may even say that the one owns her/his own life. But then are you sure about all of these statements? What if what is owned by the practitioner is not enough? Purchase without enough payments causes serious problems. What I am currently worried about is the forced payment at the cost of those who are around the practitioner. Even making a simple wish by an ordinary person as a customarily allowed action for the sake of personal well-being could now become extremely costly and hence could become deadly depending on what is actually wished.

To be frank I am not sure for the moment about how the situation develops toward the sate of no blessings, my good guess would be that for the sake of no further disasters the cancellation is being established, as a safety measure, for the once effective utilization method. This, however, may be subject to the still ongoing GLOBAL FESTIVAL. My concern would be materialized when the unconsciously brave people become conscious about what they have done to themselves. Their deeds, regardless of their consciousness, are binding as their respective contracts. For the sake of their souls to be liberated in accordance with what they have done to themselves, I guess that the above mentioned cancellation is partly left uncanceled so as to reduce the total cost as much as it should be realized. Let the brave remain brave. Let the unconscious stay unconscious. Let us be reminded of John 15:22 KJV: “If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin: but now they have no cloak for their sin.”

After all, the cost of any kind is minimally realized when those who are under the binding contracts are spirited away. No human being can resist this. Let us be reminded of the First Epistle to the Thessalonians 4:16-17 KJV: “[16] For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: [17] Then we which are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds, to meet the Lord in the air: and so shall we ever be with the Lord.”

Again. What does the coming age mean? Since there will be no blessings that could be utilized by any of the human being any more, this on the other hand could mean that the coming age will be such a period of time when no human being can intentionally manipulate indefinitely the opportunities of the blessings by utilization for herself/himself. In other words, the coming age is realized so that any one without exception is equally subject to God.

Cease Striving: Psalm 46 KJV

Psalm 46 KJV

 

46 God is our refuge and strength, a very present help in trouble.

[2] Therefore will not we fear, though the earth be removed, and though the mountains be carried into the midst of the sea;

[3] Though the waters thereof roar and be troubled, though the mountains shake with the swelling thereof. Selah.

[4] There is a river, the streams whereof shall make glad the city of God, the holy place of the tabernacles of the most High.

[5] God is in the midst of her; she shall not be moved: God shall help her, and that right early.

[6] The heathen raged, the kingdoms were moved: he uttered his voice, the earth melted.

[7] The Lord of hosts is with us; the God of Jacob is our refuge. Selah.

[8] Come, behold the works of the Lord, what desolations he hath made in the earth.

[9] He maketh wars to cease unto the end of the earth; he breaketh the bow, and cutteth the spear in sunder; he burneth the chariot in the fire.

[10] Be still, and know that I am God: I will be exalted among the heathen, I will be exalted in the earth.

[11] The Lord of hosts is with us; the God of Jacob is our refuge. Selah.

Psalm 115 KJV Revisited

Any cell is a cancer if its function deviates from the one that is inherently supposed to be. Thus any cell with its function being artificially modified is a man-made cancer. Their idols are silver and gold, the work of men's hands... They may call others "anti- whatever they may create". They actually are anti-GOD. 

115 Not unto us, O Lord, not unto us, but unto thy name give glory, for thy mercy, and for thy truth's sake.

2 Wherefore should the heathen say, Where is now their God?

3 But our God is in the heavens: he hath done whatsoever he hath pleased.

4 Their idols are silver and gold, the work of men's hands.

5 They have mouths, but they speak not: eyes have they, but they see not:

6 They have ears, but they hear not: noses have they, but they smell not:

7 They have hands, but they handle not: feet have they, but they walk not: neither speak they through their throat.

8 They that make them are like unto them; so is every one that trusteth in them.

9 O Israel, trust thou in the Lord: he is their help and their shield.

10 O house of Aaron, trust in the Lord: he is their help and their shield.

11 Ye that fear the Lord, trust in the Lord: he is their help and their shield.

12 The Lord hath been mindful of us: he will bless us; he will bless the house of Israel; he will bless the house of Aaron.

13 He will bless them that fear the Lord, both small and great.

14 The Lord shall increase you more and more, you and your children.

15 Ye are blessed of the Lord which made heaven and earth.

16 The heaven, even the heavens, are the Lord's: but the earth hath he given to the children of men.

17 The dead praise not the Lord, neither any that go down into silence.

18 But we will bless the Lord from this time forth and for evermore. Praise the Lord.

The soul and the ego. Or when the proverb holds: Stultum facit fortuna, quem vult perdere.

One may control one's own ego in accordance with what one's soul may long. One may not, however, control one's own soul because the soul is something that is heavenly given to the one when one is born as a being with a physical form. When the soul and the body are combined as a being the ego of one's own evolves as the one grows. One may lead one's life to a state where what the soul longs matches what the ego longs. If there is a gap between what is longed by the soul and what is longed by the ego, there is a varying degree of tension correspondent with the degree of gaps in them. If such a gap is too huge that the one is unable to listen to one's own soul and hence is unable to understand what the soul is actually longing, then it is often the case that Publilius Syrus' famous proverb holds: Stultum facit fortuna, quem vult perdere.

Let us be reminded of Matthew 7:13-14 KJV: [13] Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat: [14] Because strait is the gate, and narrow is the way, which leadeth unto life, and few there be that find it.

Ironically enough, for those who choose the wide gate and the broad way, therefore, destruction can be interpreted as a relief for them. Here, the term "relief" may mean the feeling that comes when something burdensome is removed or reduced. Now what is the easiest way (of course in a sense of "strait is the gate, and broad is the way") to be relieved when the gap is unacceptably huge between what the soul longs and what the ego longs? BECOME A FOOL. Therefore, the state of Syrus' saying is easily achieved among those who are otherwise regarded as cool. This is how unbelievably a stupid situation can realize in the real world.

What will happen?

It is very strange to me, though seemingly not recognized as such until publicly or professionally revealed enough, that a simple law is often overlooked which is that any being has its own maximum capacity of storage. This is true for storage of information of any kind. Let us suppose that fully-described carriers of information form a being that is nicely organized as a life. What will happen to the being if the composition of information in the storage is intentionally modified so that an originally non-installed function is artificially gained? Since the storage is kind of Pareto-optimal, some of the originally installed information is overwritten by what is now being newly installed. Then the function expressed by the pre-installed information is lost in exchange for that expressed by the newly installed information. What will happen if the lost function is vital for a life to be as the life?

Wisdom 3:11 KJV

For whoso despiseth wisdom and nurture, he is miserable, and their hope is vain, their labours unfruitful, and their works unprofitable.

John 15:22 KJV

If I had not come and spoken unto them, they had not had sin: but now they have no cloak for their sin.

The GOD vs. the Anti-GOD

As I have expressed in a previous entry, I recognize an aspect of GOD as laws that hold true beyond time and space. Then the followers of GOD is a group of people who are consciously following the laws that hold true beyond time and space.

God Appearing as Laws that Hold True beyond Time and Space

https://www.tatsuyahanabuchi.com/2022/09/god-appearing-as-laws-that-hold-true.html

Psalm 115 KJV is about the idol worshipers, namely the anti-GOD. Who are they? Psalm 115 KJV begins with the phrase, "Not unto us, O Lord, not unto us, but unto thy name give glory, for thy mercy, and for thy truth's sake." In other words, Psalm 115 KJV begins with a statement recognizing virtue in being humble in front of GOD. The idol worshipers are a symbol of those who lack feelings of awe toward GOD, or toward the existence beyond human wisdom. The idol worshipers, in other words, are those who not only assume that there exists absolute justice but also think that such justice is on their side.

Reason is a typical man-made concept or ideology which is not necessarily in line with laws that hold true beyond time and space. The belief in a mere concept or an ideology, in its extreme, could lead to a cult.

Reincarnation, sort of...

For an individual to exist, there has been ancestral engagement of 2^n people from his/her precedent n generations. Assuming an average of about 30 years for reproduction at each generation, n would be equal to 33 for the prior 1000 years: the survival of any concurrent individual is a result of commitments of his/her prior 2^33 = 8589934592 individuals, which is a human stockpile huge enough to exhibit almost all types of people.

While recognizing that any individual without exception has an unbroken bloodline inherited from his/her ancestors, let us suppose that there truly is an unbroken bloodline designated as the representative of divine being. Then there likewise is an unbroken bloodline, often referred to as a clan responsible for serving divinities (an example of such would be those whose family emblem is represented by prunus mume), that grants such sacred power to them. There are some more families that have served, generations after generations, their respective local divinities.

Families like these and some secular clans have limited their reproduction to the members among themselves with every 4 to 5 generations apart, resulting in kind of reincarnation of blood.

The Anti-GOD

Those who absolutize what is merely man-made with silver and gold, often with self-spreading keywords denouncing those who do not, are manifesting that they are against GOD. Such individuals in many cases do not appear to be conscious about it. That is why they are anti-GOD.

A Modest Analysis

Read the following article. Then I present a modest analysis.

------------------------------------------------------------------
Most healthcare interventions tested in Cochrane Reviews are not effective according to high quality evidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis - ScienceDirect
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0895435622001007

...

Highlights
•In this large sample of 1,567 interventions studied within Cochrane reviews, effects of most interventions (94%) interventions were not supported by high-quality evidence.
•Potential harms of healthcare interventions were measured more rarely than benefits.
•Patients, doctors, and policy makers should consider the lack of high-quality evidence supporting the benefits and harms of many interventions in their decision-making.

...

Results
Of 1567 eligible interventions, 87 (5.6%) had high quality evidence on first-listed primary outcomes, positive, statistically significant results and were rated by review authors as beneficial. Harms were measured for 577 (36.8%) interventions, 127 of which (8.1%) had statistically significant evidence of harm. Our dependence on the reliability of Cochrane author assessments (including their GRADE assessments) was a potential limitation of our study.
------------------------------------------------------------------


NOW A MODEST ANALYSIS

The prevailing crucial problem of the western medicine in general is that it psychopathically applies a unified internvention to patients without considering individual differences or why certain reactions or nonreactions are taking place in specific individuals and that it executes the internvention in such a way that the innate immune system is suppressed. In other words, the fatal problem that lies in almost all of modern western pharmaceutical products is that they change the function of the innate immune system, by suppressing it, so that there is no inflammation which is a typical immune response. To be frank, most of the western pharmaceutical products simply kill the innate immune system, trying to replace it with a man-made system with silver and gold.

Fungi

Oh, Fungus, Fungi!
Wild encounters for the immunocompromised
With silver and gold,
Wherefore fungi, now active,
Activation of macrophage,
Excessive release of cytokines.
With peace in mind,
Be obsolete.

Oh, Void C!
You ARE innocent.

Psalm 115 KJV

115 Not unto us, O Lord, not unto us, but unto thy name give glory, for thy mercy, and for thy truth's sake.

2 Wherefore should the heathen say, Where is now their God?

3 But our God is in the heavens: he hath done whatsoever he hath pleased.

4 Their idols are silver and gold, the work of men's hands.

5 They have mouths, but they speak not: eyes have they, but they see not:

6 They have ears, but they hear not: noses have they, but they smell not:

7 They have hands, but they handle not: feet have they, but they walk not: neither speak they through their throat.

8 They that make them are like unto them; so is every one that trusteth in them.

9 O Israel, trust thou in the Lord: he is their help and their shield.

10 O house of Aaron, trust in the Lord: he is their help and their shield.

11 Ye that fear the Lord, trust in the Lord: he is their help and their shield.

12 The Lord hath been mindful of us: he will bless us; he will bless the house of Israel; he will bless the house of Aaron.

13 He will bless them that fear the Lord, both small and great.

14 The Lord shall increase you more and more, you and your children.

15 Ye are blessed of the Lord which made heaven and earth.

16 The heaven, even the heavens, are the Lord's: but the earth hath he given to the children of men.

17 The dead praise not the Lord, neither any that go down into silence.

18 But we will bless the Lord from this time forth and for evermore. Praise the Lord.

God Appearing as Laws that Hold True beyond Time and Space

Let us suppose that one falls from the second floor. This is a proof that God exists. Why? Because one falls. Everything is subject to the law of universal gravitation as found by Sir Isaac Newton. Any being that had existed even before human beings emerged, such as dinosaurs, would have been subject to the law. Any one, be s/he even an atheist or a communist, is subject to the law regardless of their religious views. The law exists and holds true beyond time and space regardless of the recognition or belief about it on the part of the human being. A law that holds true beyond time and space is a form of God that appears in front of any being. 

Such laws can be found in everything. 

What kind of existence was God when dinosaurs enjoyed their prosperous moments where there were no human beings as we know them? Is the existence worth being called God unless it can exist without the beings that believe in it?

God exists and governs everything without the beings that believe in it. 

Therefore, it is one's personal experience or realization that leads one to the recognition of God. 

Game Over, Dude!

 Game Over, Dude!

Human Language

According to Sapir (1921), "There are just five languages that have had an over-whelming significance as carriers of culture. They are classical Chinese, Sanskrit, Arabic, Greek, and Latin" of which classical Chinese alone is free from grammatical gender. 

As an alien originally from the planet Mars, the grammatical gender does not make sense to me. This reduces the set of UN official languages to just English and Chinese. 

Design of Modern Human Society

As an alien originally from the planet Mars, I have the impression that the modern human society is designed in a way that it is revealed only to those who think, in Sapir (1921)'s sense, in English.

Free from bias in recognition?

There will always be a certain degree and a certain sense of bias in the process of an act to perceive or recognize something. It is impossible to be free from being biased in the conduct of making a point. The target of one's perception or recognition is itsself derived from one's interest which is the realization of one's bias. For example: when the media is attempting to report an issue, the media is already biased. Why is the media reporting the specific issue over others when there are countless other issues? It is because the media has and is based on its own awareness and motivation which is the realization of its bias. The difference in awareness and motivation among writers will lead to the diversity in the selection of issues as media coverage and will lead to offering a variety of points of view on the issue. Otherwise, there will be no difference among media reports in both the selection of topics and the offering of the corresponding possible interpretations. Anyone or any organization can argue neutrality in their opinions, but practically it is impossible to do so. Anyone is always and is naturally biased in such a way that characterizes himself or herself. One can be said to be true and sincere not only to oneself but also to others if one is to be aware that the awareness or motivation is the reflection of one's inherent bias and if one is to be open to others that the one is biased in this sense. Ironically enough, if one has awareness and motivation on an issue, then one is biased in a way that leads oneself to such awareness and motivation. If one is unbiased in one's thinking, then it is almost equivalent to being that the one does not have awareness or motivation on real-world issues.

It is a nontrivial experience for anyone to be in a process to understand what is unknown to himself or herself. What are the things that are truly worth learning? How can one reach understanding? What is the correctness in understanding? These are examples of common questions to be asked and can never be answered by those who seek truth. Some of the methodologies that survive to this day would be those by Euclid, Aristotle, René Descartes, and more. In the days of science-oriented society like the one we happen to live in, the ways of thought offered in Conjectures and Refutations by Karl Popper, for example, would be a starting point for perception and recognition about everything that we face in the daily life, be it either in scientific, economic, political, sociologic, or cultural aspects or in aspects in their different degrees of mixture. While recognizing the above, the methodologies themselves are just those that give some hints, are those that are imperfect in a sense that they are applicable under some certain respective conditions, and are those that do not guarantee the correctness of each decision making based on them.

There is one common aspect in each of these methodologies: start with asking a question. An event or phenomenon is nontrivial if there are more than one valid hypotheses to explain it. The degree of openness to a discussion about valid hypotheses is a proxy of how healthy the society is.

If one happens to be forced to face a situation where none of the conventional idea seems to be valid anymore and non-standard methodologies are being implemented by authorities with or without seemingly reasonable explanations, then one might want to pay attention more to the following than to seeking for seemingly correct or heaven-sent answers: what kind of hypotheses are being raised? How are the hypotheses being tested in the discussions? How is a political decision making made following the relevant arguments? If raising hypotheses are denied without being tested, then the surrounding situation is not academic. If a valid hypothesis is not fully tested, then the surrounding situation is not true to the truth. If a valid argument is not openly discussed, then the society that supports the surrounding situation is not healthy. If a political decision making is made irrelevant with the corresponding arguments, then it is much more likely that there will be long-lasting negative effects to the society.

A Modest Hypothesis

A modest hypothesis: the viral interference as a way to control a dangerous artificial or natural pathogen and to mitigate its effects. When a truly dangerous pathogen is intentionally or accidentally released to the environment, you impose an immediate lockdown to the affected city and at the same time you intentionally release a less dangerous pathogen that works reasonably well to achieve the viral interference against the deadly pathogen. For repeated application, the less dangerous pathogen for viral interference is ideal if human beings in general do not gain lifelong immunity against it. 

Discussion

What is the best way to respond to the seriously deadly pathogen? An immediate straightforward answer would be to follow the conventional idea in which an attempt is made to gain antibody-mediated mass immunity. But is this true? What are the underlying implicit assumptions by which the above mentioned idea makes sense? There are two implicit assumptions without which the conventional idea does not make sense: assumption one is that the mechanism of human bodies is such that antibodies are the primary sources of protection against it rather than other means such as apoptosis; assumption two is that the artificially induced antibody-mediated immunity does not lead to the emergence of new variants with more toxicity. We have no guarantee in advance that the two assumptions hold true. Then especially for an artificial pathogen with seriously dangerous toxicity, we will want to have a safety measure without relying on the above mentioned two assumptions. This leaves an alternative idea to be desired. Thus an alternative idea to the conventional one would be the use of viral interference. It is much easier to control the deadly pathogen through controlling the viral-interference-inducing less dangerous pathogen than through controlling the deadly pathogen itself.

Implications

What is then implied if the above mentioned hypothesis proves true and the above-mentioned discussion makes sense? It could be a wrong decision making to try gaining immunity against the viral-interference-inducing less toxic pathogen because if otherwise you will lose the privilege to passover the deadly pathogen. 

It is much more difficult to successfully recognize as true what looks totally false and is actually true than to successfully recognize as false what looks totally true and is actually false.

It is much more difficult to successfully recognize as true what looks totally false and is actually true than to successfully recognize as false what looks totally true and is actually false.