The GOD vs. the Anti-GOD

As I have expressed in a previous entry, I recognize an aspect of GOD as laws that hold true beyond time and space. Then the followers of GOD is a group of people who are consciously following the laws that hold true beyond time and space.

God Appearing as Laws that Hold True beyond Time and Space

https://www.tatsuyahanabuchi.com/2022/09/god-appearing-as-laws-that-hold-true.html

Psalm 115 KJV is about the idol worshipers, namely the anti-GOD. Who are they? Psalm 115 KJV begins with the phrase, "Not unto us, O Lord, not unto us, but unto thy name give glory, for thy mercy, and for thy truth's sake." In other words, Psalm 115 KJV begins with a statement recognizing virtue in being humble in front of GOD. The idol worshipers are a symbol of those who lack feelings of awe toward GOD, or toward the existence beyond human wisdom. The idol worshipers, in other words, are those who not only assume that there exists absolute justice but also think that such justice is on their side.

Reason is a typical man-made concept or ideology which is not necessarily in line with laws that hold true beyond time and space. The belief in a mere concept or an ideology, in its extreme, could lead to a cult.

Reincarnation, sort of...

For an individual to exist, there has been ancestral engagement of 2^n people from his/her precedent n generations. Assuming an average of about 30 years for reproduction at each generation, n would be equal to 33 for the prior 1000 years: the survival of any concurrent individual is a result of commitments of his/her prior 2^33 = 8589934592 individuals, which is a human stockpile huge enough to exhibit almost all types of people.

While recognizing that any individual without exception has an unbroken bloodline inherited from his/her ancestors, let us suppose that there truly is an unbroken bloodline designated as the representative of divine being. Then there likewise is an unbroken bloodline, often referred to as a clan responsible for serving divinities (an example of such would be those whose family emblem is represented by prunus mume), that grants such sacred power to them. There are some more families that have served, generations after generations, their respective local divinities.

Families like these and some secular clans have limited their reproduction to the members among themselves with every 4 to 5 generations apart, resulting in kind of reincarnation of blood.

The Anti-GOD

Those who absolutize what is merely man-made with silver and gold, often with self-spreading keywords denouncing those who do not, are manifesting that they are against GOD. Such individuals in many cases do not appear to be conscious about it. That is why they are anti-GOD.

A Modest Analysis

Read the following article. Then I present a modest analysis.

------------------------------------------------------------------
Most healthcare interventions tested in Cochrane Reviews are not effective according to high quality evidence: a systematic review and meta-analysis - ScienceDirect
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0895435622001007

...

Highlights
•In this large sample of 1,567 interventions studied within Cochrane reviews, effects of most interventions (94%) interventions were not supported by high-quality evidence.
•Potential harms of healthcare interventions were measured more rarely than benefits.
•Patients, doctors, and policy makers should consider the lack of high-quality evidence supporting the benefits and harms of many interventions in their decision-making.

...

Results
Of 1567 eligible interventions, 87 (5.6%) had high quality evidence on first-listed primary outcomes, positive, statistically significant results and were rated by review authors as beneficial. Harms were measured for 577 (36.8%) interventions, 127 of which (8.1%) had statistically significant evidence of harm. Our dependence on the reliability of Cochrane author assessments (including their GRADE assessments) was a potential limitation of our study.
------------------------------------------------------------------


NOW A MODEST ANALYSIS

The prevailing crucial problem of the western medicine in general is that it psychopathically applies a unified internvention to patients without considering individual differences or why certain reactions or nonreactions are taking place in specific individuals and that it executes the internvention in such a way that the innate immune system is suppressed. In other words, the fatal problem that lies in almost all of modern western pharmaceutical products is that they change the function of the innate immune system, by suppressing it, so that there is no inflammation which is a typical immune response. To be frank, most of the western pharmaceutical products simply kill the innate immune system, trying to replace it with a man-made system with silver and gold.

Fungi

Oh, Fungus, Fungi!
Wild encounters for the immunocompromised
With silver and gold,
Wherefore fungi, now active,
Activation of macrophage,
Excessive release of cytokines.
With peace in mind,
Be obsolete.

Oh, Void C!
You ARE innocent.

Psalm 115 KJV

115 Not unto us, O Lord, not unto us, but unto thy name give glory, for thy mercy, and for thy truth's sake.

2 Wherefore should the heathen say, Where is now their God?

3 But our God is in the heavens: he hath done whatsoever he hath pleased.

4 Their idols are silver and gold, the work of men's hands.

5 They have mouths, but they speak not: eyes have they, but they see not:

6 They have ears, but they hear not: noses have they, but they smell not:

7 They have hands, but they handle not: feet have they, but they walk not: neither speak they through their throat.

8 They that make them are like unto them; so is every one that trusteth in them.

9 O Israel, trust thou in the Lord: he is their help and their shield.

10 O house of Aaron, trust in the Lord: he is their help and their shield.

11 Ye that fear the Lord, trust in the Lord: he is their help and their shield.

12 The Lord hath been mindful of us: he will bless us; he will bless the house of Israel; he will bless the house of Aaron.

13 He will bless them that fear the Lord, both small and great.

14 The Lord shall increase you more and more, you and your children.

15 Ye are blessed of the Lord which made heaven and earth.

16 The heaven, even the heavens, are the Lord's: but the earth hath he given to the children of men.

17 The dead praise not the Lord, neither any that go down into silence.

18 But we will bless the Lord from this time forth and for evermore. Praise the Lord.

God Appearing as Laws that Hold True beyond Time and Space

Let us suppose that one falls from the second floor. This is a proof that God exists. Why? Because one falls. Everything is subject to the law of universal gravitation as found by Sir Isaac Newton. Any being that had existed even before human beings emerged, such as dinosaurs, would have been subject to the law. Any one, be s/he even an atheist or a communist, is subject to the law regardless of their religious views. The law exists and holds true beyond time and space regardless of the recognition or belief about it on the part of the human being. A law that holds true beyond time and space is a form of God that appears in front of any being. 

Such laws can be found in everything. 

What kind of existence was God when dinosaurs enjoyed their prosperous moments where there were no human beings as we know them? Is the existence worth being called God unless it can exist without the beings that believe in it?

God exists and governs everything without the beings that believe in it. 

Therefore, it is one's personal experience or realization that leads one to the recognition of God. 

Game Over, Dude!

 Game Over, Dude!

Human Language

According to Sapir (1921), "There are just five languages that have had an over-whelming significance as carriers of culture. They are classical Chinese, Sanskrit, Arabic, Greek, and Latin" of which classical Chinese alone is free from grammatical gender. 

As an alien originally from the planet Mars, the grammatical gender does not make sense to me. This reduces the set of UN official languages to just English and Chinese. 

Design of Modern Human Society

As an alien originally from the planet Mars, I have the impression that the modern human society is designed in a way that it is revealed only to those who think, in Sapir (1921)'s sense, in English.

Free from bias in recognition?

There will always be a certain degree and a certain sense of bias in the process of an act to perceive or recognize something. It is impossible to be free from being biased in the conduct of making a point. The target of one's perception or recognition is itsself derived from one's interest which is the realization of one's bias. For example: when the media is attempting to report an issue, the media is already biased. Why is the media reporting the specific issue over others when there are countless other issues? It is because the media has and is based on its own awareness and motivation which is the realization of its bias. The difference in awareness and motivation among writers will lead to the diversity in the selection of issues as media coverage and will lead to offering a variety of points of view on the issue. Otherwise, there will be no difference among media reports in both the selection of topics and the offering of the corresponding possible interpretations. Anyone or any organization can argue neutrality in their opinions, but practically it is impossible to do so. Anyone is always and is naturally biased in such a way that characterizes himself or herself. One can be said to be true and sincere not only to oneself but also to others if one is to be aware that the awareness or motivation is the reflection of one's inherent bias and if one is to be open to others that the one is biased in this sense. Ironically enough, if one has awareness and motivation on an issue, then one is biased in a way that leads oneself to such awareness and motivation. If one is unbiased in one's thinking, then it is almost equivalent to being that the one does not have awareness or motivation on real-world issues.

It is a nontrivial experience for anyone to be in a process to understand what is unknown to himself or herself. What are the things that are truly worth learning? How can one reach understanding? What is the correctness in understanding? These are examples of common questions to be asked and can never be answered by those who seek truth. Some of the methodologies that survive to this day would be those by Euclid, Aristotle, René Descartes, and more. In the days of science-oriented society like the one we happen to live in, the ways of thought offered in Conjectures and Refutations by Karl Popper, for example, would be a starting point for perception and recognition about everything that we face in the daily life, be it either in scientific, economic, political, sociologic, or cultural aspects or in aspects in their different degrees of mixture. While recognizing the above, the methodologies themselves are just those that give some hints, are those that are imperfect in a sense that they are applicable under some certain respective conditions, and are those that do not guarantee the correctness of each decision making based on them.

There is one common aspect in each of these methodologies: start with asking a question. An event or phenomenon is nontrivial if there are more than one valid hypotheses to explain it. The degree of openness to a discussion about valid hypotheses is a proxy of how healthy the society is.

If one happens to be forced to face a situation where none of the conventional idea seems to be valid anymore and non-standard methodologies are being implemented by authorities with or without seemingly reasonable explanations, then one might want to pay attention more to the following than to seeking for seemingly correct or heaven-sent answers: what kind of hypotheses are being raised? How are the hypotheses being tested in the discussions? How is a political decision making made following the relevant arguments? If raising hypotheses are denied without being tested, then the surrounding situation is not academic. If a valid hypothesis is not fully tested, then the surrounding situation is not true to the truth. If a valid argument is not openly discussed, then the society that supports the surrounding situation is not healthy. If a political decision making is made irrelevant with the corresponding arguments, then it is much more likely that there will be long-lasting negative effects to the society.

A Modest Hypothesis

A modest hypothesis: the viral interference as a way to control a dangerous artificial or natural pathogen and to mitigate its effects. When a truly dangerous pathogen is intentionally or accidentally released to the environment, you impose an immediate lockdown to the affected city and at the same time you intentionally release a less dangerous pathogen that works reasonably well to achieve the viral interference against the deadly pathogen. For repeated application, the less dangerous pathogen for viral interference is ideal if human beings in general do not gain lifelong immunity against it. 

Discussion

What is the best way to respond to the seriously deadly pathogen? An immediate straightforward answer would be to follow the conventional idea in which an attempt is made to gain antibody-mediated mass immunity. But is this true? What are the underlying implicit assumptions by which the above mentioned idea makes sense? There are two implicit assumptions without which the conventional idea does not make sense: assumption one is that the mechanism of human bodies is such that antibodies are the primary sources of protection against it rather than other means such as apoptosis; assumption two is that the artificially induced antibody-mediated immunity does not lead to the emergence of new variants with more toxicity. We have no guarantee in advance that the two assumptions hold true. Then especially for an artificial pathogen with seriously dangerous toxicity, we will want to have a safety measure without relying on the above mentioned two assumptions. This leaves an alternative idea to be desired. Thus an alternative idea to the conventional one would be the use of viral interference. It is much easier to control the deadly pathogen through controlling the viral-interference-inducing less dangerous pathogen than through controlling the deadly pathogen itself.

Implications

What is then implied if the above mentioned hypothesis proves true and the above-mentioned discussion makes sense? It could be a wrong decision making to try gaining immunity against the viral-interference-inducing less toxic pathogen because if otherwise you will lose the privilege to passover the deadly pathogen. 

It is much more difficult to successfully recognize as true what looks totally false and is actually true than to successfully recognize as false what looks totally true and is actually false.

It is much more difficult to successfully recognize as true what looks totally false and is actually true than to successfully recognize as false what looks totally true and is actually false. 

What if I am a snail and want to migrate

What if I am a snail and want to migrate to a different place so far away that it would cost the rest of my life if I move by myself? I've thought twice before I come to a tentative conclusion about which I am going to tell you now. I've noticed in my life quite often that the seeds of plants can be relocated by being discharged as bird droppings. Right, here we go. I'll let a migratory bird eat myself and hope to be released while surviving somehow without being digested. And yet here is the trickiest part: I have to accomplish a safe landing at the right timing. I still need some more moments of reflection for that.

Huh?

  Huh, Tatsuya? OK... Never mind.